Rincón de los Apple Fans (iPhone, iPad, iPod, iMac, Apple TV, etc...)

[DutyFree]

Chuta que tienes cosas... el de mi sra.  es de 64 gigas y tiene como 50 gigas libres.

Probablemente se trata de respaldos, caché, etc... como el telefono tiene harta memoria la fgestion de espacio del sistema no se molesta en borrar, en uno de 16 giga no te va a pasar eso.

[Archer 3]

o si le alcanza o no para comprarlo en efectivo.

en serio tu crees que un iphone vale 800 lucas?     

[Archer 3]

Chuta que tienes cosas... el de mi sra.  es de 64 gigas y tiene como 50 gigas libres.

Probablemente se trata de respaldos, caché, etc... como el telefono tiene harta memoria la fgestion de espacio del sistema no se molesta en borrar, en uno de 16 giga no te va a pasar eso.

hoy miré el de mi hija que tiene 16 gigas, de los cuales 11.4 son para ella y tenía la misma embarrada. Hice igual proceso y pasó de tener 1 giga libre a casi 8...

[DutyFree]

en serio tu crees que un iphone vale 800 lucas?   

Estaba hueveando nomás. Pero igual se completó la misión porque se picaron 

Obvio que no vale 800 lucas, las casas viejas que hay en Vitacura a 10.000 uf tampoco valen 10.000 uf, pero hay gente que las quiere y paga lo que piden.

En Amazon si tratas de comprar el telefono no sale mucho más barato que acá, en cambio si tomas uno en comodato allá en USA te cobran una tarifa mucho más conveniente... creo que MacOnline es un bebé de pecho al lado de lo frescos que son en las compañias telefónicas con el iPhone.

[DutyFree]

hoy miré el de mi hija que tiene 16 gigas, de los cuales 11.4 son para ella y tenía la misma embarrada. Hice igual proceso y pasó de tener 1 giga libre a casi 8...

Voy a hacer la prueba, buen dato 

[Pandoso]

uta q es paja chatear con los usuarios de IPhone, como no se les actualiza el Whatsapp uno les manda emoticones nuevos y quedan 
Porque les sale un puro cuadrao 

[Archer 3]

Voy a hacer la prueba, buen dato 

Hazlo, conéctalo a itunes y fíjate cómo te dice que está ocupado el espacio y ve si te hace sentido. en particular fíjate en ese ítem de "documentos y datos" y "otros", ahí está el espacio tomado.

yo creo que en mi caso eso sucede porque generalmente bajo las fotos desde el pc y en lugar de borrarlas en el iphone lo hago vía adm. de archivos de office y puede que eso no sea lo mejor.

los otros espacios ocupados por archivos de wassap o facebook no ocupan mucho, más bien poco.

[Archer 3]

uta q es paja chatear con los usuarios de IPhone, como no se les actualiza el Whatsapp uno les manda emoticones nuevos y quedan 
Porque les sale un puro cuadrao 

no me ha pasado, yo uso los emoticones de Emoji... a lo mejor los que tu bajas son compatibles solo con ellos mismos 

[Pandoso]

no me ha pasado, yo uso los emoticones de Emoji... a lo mejor los que tu bajas son compatibles solo con ellos mismos 

no he bajado nada, sólo los nuevos que vienen en la ultima version de wsp, ah, de android obviamente 

[Archer 3]

no he bajado nada, sólo los nuevos que vienen en la ultima version de wsp, ah, de android obviamente 

IOs siempre es más limitado y ni idea por qué. pasa con aplicaciones de mapa que los que se ven enandroid están más actualizados y en navegación aérea eso no deja de ser importante. Es muy distinto ver en un mismo sector una pista de cemento en android a ver un peladero en IOs y me ha pasado.

la versión de wassap según recuerdo no trae emoticones, esos se instalan como un teclado complementario.

[DutyFree]

IOs siempre es más limitado y ni idea por qué. pasa con aplicaciones de mapa que los que se ven enandroid están más actualizados y en navegación aérea eso no deja de ser importante. Es muy distinto ver en un mismo sector una pista de cemento en android a ver un peladero en IOs y me ha pasado.

la versión de wassap según recuerdo no trae emoticones, esos se instalan como un teclado complementario.

los mapas de Apple son mas nitidos pero valen yuyo, desde que tengo el iphone 5 sale lo mismo... hay que mirar el google maps, ahi se actualiza con bastante frecuencia.

[BlackAdam]

Usad Telegram.

[Archer 3]

los mapas de Apple son mas nitidos pero valen yuyo, desde que tengo el iphone 5 sale lo mismo... hay que mirar el google maps, ahi se actualiza con bastante frecuencia.

me refiero a aplicaciones que usan mapas de google, en android son imágenes más actualizadas que en la misma aplicación para IOs.

Los mapas de iphone valen hongo.

[DutyFree]

me refiero a aplicaciones que usan mapas de google, en android son imágenes más actualizadas que en la misma aplicación para IOs.

Los mapas de iphone valen hongo.

ahhh ok... yo no tengo a mano telefonos con Android asi que no he podido comparar.

[BlackAdam]

Algo raro hay en eso de los mapas.
Si Apple quisiera competir agresivamente contra GoogleMaps, y esto explicara por qué la aplicación de Google se actualiza poco en iXXXX, mejoraría más seguido los que le pasa TomTom para su aplicación nativa. Pero no ha hecho eso, los mapas de Apple están muy desactualizados comparados con los de Google.

Entonces, no se entiende por qué ambas aplicaciones de mapas valen yuyo.
Se nota mucho si usan el GoogleMaps en el Safari del iPhone: los mapas tienen mejor resolución.

[grx8]

February 16, 2016 A Message to Our Customers
The United States government has demanded that Apple take an unprecedented step which threatens the security of our customers. We oppose this order, which has implications far beyond the legal case at hand.

This moment calls for public discussion, and we want our customers and people around the country to understand what is at stake.

Answers to your questions about privacy and security

The Need for Encryption
Smartphones, led by iPhone, have become an essential part of our lives. People use them to store an incredible amount of personal information, from our private conversations to our photos, our music, our notes, our calendars and contacts, our financial information and health data, even where we have been and where we are going.

All that information needs to be protected from hackers and criminals who want to access it, steal it, and use it without our knowledge or permission. Customers expect Apple and other technology companies to do everything in our power to protect their personal information, and at Apple we are deeply committed to safeguarding their data.

Compromising the security of our personal information can ultimately put our personal safety at risk. That is why encryption has become so important to all of us.

For many years, we have used encryption to protect our customers " personal data because we believe it "s the only way to keep their information safe. We have even put that data out of our own reach, because we believe the contents of your iPhone are none of our business.

The San Bernardino Case
We were shocked and outraged by the deadly act of terrorism in San Bernardino last December. We mourn the loss of life and want justice for all those whose lives were affected. The FBI asked us for help in the days following the attack, and we have worked hard to support the government "s efforts to solve this horrible crime. We have no sympathy for terrorists.

When the FBI has requested data that "s in our possession, we have provided it. Apple complies with valid subpoenas and search warrants, as we have in the San Bernardino case. We have also made Apple engineers available to advise the FBI, and we "ve offered our best ideas on a number of investigative options at their disposal.

We have great respect for the professionals at the FBI, and we believe their intentions are good. Up to this point, we have done everything that is both within our power and within the law to help them. But now the U.S. government has asked us for something we simply do not have, and something we consider too dangerous to create. They have asked us to build a backdoor to the iPhone.

Specifically, the FBI wants us to make a new version of the iPhone operating system, circumventing several important security features, and install it on an iPhone recovered during the investigation. In the wrong hands, this software â€" which does not exist today â€" would have the potential to unlock any iPhone in someone "s physical possession.

The FBI may use different words to describe this tool, but make no mistake: Building a version of iOS that bypasses security in this way would undeniably create a backdoor. And while the government may argue that its use would be limited to this case, there is no way to guarantee such control.

The Threat to Data Security
Some would argue that building a backdoor for just one iPhone is a simple, clean-cut solution. But it ignores both the basics of digital security and the significance of what the government is demanding in this case.

In today "s digital world, the "key " to an encrypted system is a piece of information that unlocks the data, and it is only as secure as the protections around it. Once the information is known, or a way to bypass the code is revealed, the encryption can be defeated by anyone with that knowledge.

The government suggests this tool could only be used once, on one phone. But that "s simply not true. Once created, the technique could be used over and over again, on any number of devices. In the physical world, it would be the equivalent of a master key, capable of opening hundreds of millions of locks â€" from restaurants and banks to stores and homes. No reasonable person would find that acceptable.

The government is asking Apple to hack our own users and undermine decades of security advancements that protect our customers â€" including tens of millions of American citizens â€" from sophisticated hackers and cybercriminals. The same engineers who built strong encryption into the iPhone to protect our users would, ironically, be ordered to weaken those protections and make our users less safe.

We can find no precedent for an American company being forced to expose its customers to a greater risk of attack. For years, cryptologists and national security experts have been warning against weakening encryption. Doing so would hurt only the well-meaning and law-abiding citizens who rely on companies like Apple to protect their data. Criminals and bad actors will still encrypt, using tools that are readily available to them.

A Dangerous Precedent
Rather than asking for legislative action through Congress, the FBI is proposing an unprecedented use of the All Writs Act of 1789 to justify an expansion of its authority.

The government would have us remove security features and add new capabilities to the operating system, allowing a passcode to be input electronically. This would make it easier to unlock an iPhone by "brute force," trying thousands or millions of combinations with the speed of a modern computer.

The implications of the government "s demands are chilling. If the government can use the All Writs Act to make it easier to unlock your iPhone, it would have the power to reach into anyone "s device to capture their data. The government could extend this breach of privacy and demand that Apple build surveillance software to intercept your messages, access your health records or financial data, track your location, or even access your phone "s microphone or camera without your knowledge.

Opposing this order is not something we take lightly. We feel we must speak up in the face of what we see as an overreach by the U.S. government.

We are challenging the FBI"s demands with the deepest respect for American democracy and a love of our country. We believe it would be in the best interest of everyone to step back and consider the implications.

While we believe the FBI"s intentions are good, it would be wrong for the government to force us to build a backdoor into our products. And ultimately, we fear that this demand would undermine the very freedoms and liberty our government is meant to protect.

Tim Cook

[chunchos]

February 16, 2016 A Message to Our Customers
The United States government has demanded that Apple take an unprecedented step which threatens the security of our customers. We oppose this order, which has implications far beyond the legal case at hand.

This moment calls for public discussion, and we want our customers and people around the country to understand what is at stake.

Answers to your questions about privacy and security

The Need for Encryption
Smartphones, led by iPhone, have become an essential part of our lives. People use them to store an incredible amount of personal information, from our private conversations to our photos, our music, our notes, our calendars and contacts, our financial information and health data, even where we have been and where we are going.

All that information needs to be protected from hackers and criminals who want to access it, steal it, and use it without our knowledge or permission. Customers expect Apple and other technology companies to do everything in our power to protect their personal information, and at Apple we are deeply committed to safeguarding their data.

Compromising the security of our personal information can ultimately put our personal safety at risk. That is why encryption has become so important to all of us.

For many years, we have used encryption to protect our customers " personal data because we believe it "s the only way to keep their information safe. We have even put that data out of our own reach, because we believe the contents of your iPhone are none of our business.

The San Bernardino Case
We were shocked and outraged by the deadly act of terrorism in San Bernardino last December. We mourn the loss of life and want justice for all those whose lives were affected. The FBI asked us for help in the days following the attack, and we have worked hard to support the government "s efforts to solve this horrible crime. We have no sympathy for terrorists.

When the FBI has requested data that "s in our possession, we have provided it. Apple complies with valid subpoenas and search warrants, as we have in the San Bernardino case. We have also made Apple engineers available to advise the FBI, and we "ve offered our best ideas on a number of investigative options at their disposal.

We have great respect for the professionals at the FBI, and we believe their intentions are good. Up to this point, we have done everything that is both within our power and within the law to help them. But now the U.S. government has asked us for something we simply do not have, and something we consider too dangerous to create. They have asked us to build a backdoor to the iPhone.

Specifically, the FBI wants us to make a new version of the iPhone operating system, circumventing several important security features, and install it on an iPhone recovered during the investigation. In the wrong hands, this software â€" which does not exist today â€" would have the potential to unlock any iPhone in someone "s physical possession.

The FBI may use different words to describe this tool, but make no mistake: Building a version of iOS that bypasses security in this way would undeniably create a backdoor. And while the government may argue that its use would be limited to this case, there is no way to guarantee such control.

The Threat to Data Security
Some would argue that building a backdoor for just one iPhone is a simple, clean-cut solution. But it ignores both the basics of digital security and the significance of what the government is demanding in this case.

In today "s digital world, the "key " to an encrypted system is a piece of information that unlocks the data, and it is only as secure as the protections around it. Once the information is known, or a way to bypass the code is revealed, the encryption can be defeated by anyone with that knowledge.

The government suggests this tool could only be used once, on one phone. But that "s simply not true. Once created, the technique could be used over and over again, on any number of devices. In the physical world, it would be the equivalent of a master key, capable of opening hundreds of millions of locks â€" from restaurants and banks to stores and homes. No reasonable person would find that acceptable.

The government is asking Apple to hack our own users and undermine decades of security advancements that protect our customers â€" including tens of millions of American citizens â€" from sophisticated hackers and cybercriminals. The same engineers who built strong encryption into the iPhone to protect our users would, ironically, be ordered to weaken those protections and make our users less safe.

We can find no precedent for an American company being forced to expose its customers to a greater risk of attack. For years, cryptologists and national security experts have been warning against weakening encryption. Doing so would hurt only the well-meaning and law-abiding citizens who rely on companies like Apple to protect their data. Criminals and bad actors will still encrypt, using tools that are readily available to them.

A Dangerous Precedent
Rather than asking for legislative action through Congress, the FBI is proposing an unprecedented use of the All Writs Act of 1789 to justify an expansion of its authority.

The government would have us remove security features and add new capabilities to the operating system, allowing a passcode to be input electronically. This would make it easier to unlock an iPhone by "brute force," trying thousands or millions of combinations with the speed of a modern computer.

The implications of the government "s demands are chilling. If the government can use the All Writs Act to make it easier to unlock your iPhone, it would have the power to reach into anyone "s device to capture their data. The government could extend this breach of privacy and demand that Apple build surveillance software to intercept your messages, access your health records or financial data, track your location, or even access your phone "s microphone or camera without your knowledge.

Opposing this order is not something we take lightly. We feel we must speak up in the face of what we see as an overreach by the U.S. government.

We are challenging the FBI"s demands with the deepest respect for American democracy and a love of our country. We believe it would be in the best interest of everyone to step back and consider the implications.

While we believe the FBI"s intentions are good, it would be wrong for the government to force us to build a backdoor into our products. And ultimately, we fear that this demand would undermine the very freedoms and liberty our government is meant to protect.

Tim Cook

Viva !!!

[Pandoso]

Siguiendo con lo bodrio que es IPhone, ahora el wsp de android puede mandar documentos, pero no se puede enviar a los que tienen iPhone... La chantaaaaa!! 


Enviado desde mi D6000 mediante Tapatalk

[HIAT]

Siguiendo con lo bodrio que es IPhone, ahora el wsp de android puede mandar documentos, pero no se puede enviar a los que tienen iPhone... La chantaaaaa!! 


Enviado desde mi D6000 mediante Tapatalk

Yo sí puedo, hay q actualizar la app no más


Enviado desde mi iPhone 6S utilizando Tapatalk

[Pandoso]

Yo sí puedo, hay q actualizar la app no más


Enviado desde mi iPhone 6S utilizando Tapatalk

Aah no se actualiza automáticamente? Q atroh...

Enviado desde mi D6000 mediante Tapatalk